First of all I want to thank all four guest writers for this past weeks blog content. Though there was not much by way of comments, blog traffic was over 5 times what it usually is. The one item that sticks out at me is that all views seemed to hold, to some degree an objective view of justification, though Connie's view did not place emphasis there.
Connie, and Dawn, both held a universal view of justification, and it appeared to me that Matt did as well. Connie's view was hopeful that justification which occurred for all was also applied to all, or that all would reap the benefits of it. Both Dawn and Matt, saw justification as purchased for all in Christ, but applied to those who by faith receive it. I imagine if Dawn and Matt continued to hash this out we would see quite a difference in how faith is received, nonetheless the nature of a universal unlimited justification based on an unlimited atonement seems to drive their view of justification. Dawn and Matt both seemed to attach this atonement firmly to Christ as second Adam for us. Connie seemed less intent on getting into the how justification occurred objectively, and more into what action that justification produces in the world.
Ralph's reformed baptist view was the only view of the four that had atonement as limited to the elect. Ralph's emphasis is on a monergistic work of Christ to redeem his people entirely independent of their efforts. Ralph, Matt, and Dawn all held to what I saw to be objective justification, in other words, we are justified by the life, death, resurrection of Christ for us as a historical fact. Connie may or may not believe that, but she affirmed that her focus was not at all on the 'how' but on the 'what this will produce'.
The greatest difference between the three classically orthodox views (Matt, Ralph, and Dawn) is how justification is applied. Ralph has it applied on the basis of election which guarantees faith, Dawn and Matt have it based on faith which applies the already given justification. Matt and Dawn's views would then differ on how faith is given or exercised.
Other thoughts? What did I miss?